Afghanistan: Time to go!

Almost three quarters of the U.S. people say we want an early end to the Afghanistan war. Now is the time to press President Obama and our legislators to set an exit plan with a speedy timetable for withdrawal.

It's already by far our country's longest war. Over 1,300 U.S. troops have been killed, and thousands wounded, in Afghanistan. Last year over 2,500 civilians were killed there, and over 3,200 wounded, in conflict-related situations. In two weeks last month, over 200 civilians were killed in military operations.

A horrendous example of the war's deadly toll on civilians occurred March 1, when nine boys ages 9 through 15 were shot to death by NATO helicopter gunners as they gathered firewood for their families in a desperately poor area high in the mountains. One teenager was the sole support of his family, including his 13 sisters.

In monetary terms, the war is costing $2 billion a week, or $100 billion a year, at a time when leaders of both parties are worrying about the deficit, and House Republicans are trying to gut social programs right and left on the pretext the debt must be reduced.

Political leaders from both parties are stepping up calls for a speedy end to the war.

On Feb. 26, the Democratic National Committee passed a resolution at its annual meeting declaring that the Democratic Party "supports prioritizing job creation and a swift withdrawal of U.S. armed forces and military contractors in Afghanistan," with a "significant and sizable" cut no later than July 2011.

The resolution was submitted by U.S. Representative Barbara Lee, D-Calif., with fellow California Democratic Rep. Mike Honda; Donna Brazile, DNC vice chair for the District of Columbia and Alice Germond, DNC secretary for West Virginia. It emphasizes that there is no military solution to the conflict, and cites a Gallup poll released Feb. 2, that found 72 percent of Americans favor a speeded-up withdrawal of troops.

The resolution also said the Democratic Party recognizes the "enormous strain" the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan have placed on the troops and their families, and "remains committed" to making sure troops have the support they need while deployed and the care they and their families "need and deserve" when they come home.

The DNC's action follows several other recent initiatives by members of Congress.

  • On Jan. 25, U.S. Senator Barbara Boxer, D-Calif., introduced S. 186, calling on President Obama to submit a plan for "phased redeployment of U.S. combat forces" starting July 1, with an end date for withdrawal.
  • On Feb. 10, U.S. Rep. Lynn Woolsey, D-Calif., introduced H.R. 651, to ban "permanent basing or military presence" of U.S. forces in Afghanistan, with a date for "complete, safe and orderly" withdrawal of all troops, contractors and Defense Department employees.
  • On Feb. 17, Lee introduced H.R. 780, to limit funding for U.S. armed forces there to what's needed for "safe and orderly withdrawal " of all U.S. forces and contractors."
  • The next day, Reps. James McGovern, D-Mass. and Walter Jones, R-N.C. wrote in the Washington Post, that the "human and financial costs" of the war are "unacceptable," and called for "an exit plan to extricate ourselves from Afghanistan, not a plan to 'stay there four more years and then we'll see.'"

And on Feb. 25, defense Secretary Robert Gates warned West Point cadets that the U.S. army should not "turn into a Victorian nation-building constabulary - designed to chase guerrillas, build schools or sip tea."

All this legislation deserves our full support. This is the time to call/write/e-mail your representatives in the House and Senate, urging them to sign on as cosponsors of the various bills.

And, to let the White House know that we want the war to end promptly, with complete withdrawal of all military and military-related personnel, and reconstruction led by the Afghan people with the aid of international organizations.

 

Post your comment

Comments are moderated. See guidelines here.

Comments

  • The 1980 Summer Olympics boycott of the Moscow Olympics was a part of a package of actions initiated by the United States to protest the Soviets invading Afghanistan.........So why are the United States allowed to host or compete in the past, current , and future Olympics when the US invaded Afganistan? Practice what you preach.

    Posted by factsaretruth, 05/23/2011 10:38pm (3 years ago)

  • After the Russians left, Afghans ended up fighting between themselves. For orderly change the US must offer very reasonable terms to the Taliban, that the Taliban agree to stay out of Kabul for a while. A Congressional bill could say no more funding unless the US offers generous concessions including a 30 day drone cease-fire to allow negotiations to get started. Martin Luther King, Gandhi and Bishop Tutu met with rulers and leaders, and ordinary Congressional Reps. can visit China and other countries to see if they are willing to guard Kabul for a while to give tensions time to cool,
    http://my.firedoglake.com/richardkanepa/2011/05/16/in-past-people-negotiated-an-end-to-a-war/

    We all must remember that if the US goes bankrupt bin Laden would have won one of his major goals,
    By not destoying every communication and email after it was sent, bin Laden misjudged our abilities. In the end he will have misjudged our ability to undo the hatreds he managed to ferment.

    Posted by Richard Kane, 05/17/2011 10:49pm (3 years ago)

  • After all the crying and moaning about bringing home the troops. Obama has not only left them there, he has entered the US military into another theatre (Libya). Obama sure duped the voters.

    Posted by leftbehind, 04/29/2011 10:45pm (3 years ago)

  • If enter a war with a plan, but don't have a exit plan. Isn't that called a "Suicide Mission"?

    Posted by lefttodie, 04/17/2011 7:58pm (3 years ago)

  • If you're still fighting someone for over eight years, that means you're losing. Just like Vietnam.

    Posted by cantwin, 04/16/2011 3:31am (3 years ago)

  • US Troops in Afganistan are'nt coming home any time soon. There are still US Troops in Bosnia and Korea.

    Posted by homesweethome, 04/15/2011 8:07pm (3 years ago)

  • I remember when the U.S. invaded, Afghans I know regardless of political view (that is, supporters of the Taliban vs. Northern Alliance) all laughed and essentially said this was going to be a waste of time.

    They weren't kidding. Afghanistan isn't called the "grave yard of empires" for no reason.

    But perhaps I have forgotten that we are Americans, and that everything we touch turns to gold, right?

    Someone is getting something out of this and its not the American people! Any guesses?

    Posted by Mike Greer, 03/24/2011 10:51pm (3 years ago)

  • The nation's economy is in the toilet! Public workers and school teachers are being used as scapegoats and getting laid off!
    Meanwhile our government continues to fund the war machine at an estimated cost of $4 billion per week!
    This is an outrage! The anti-war movement must join forces with the labor movement and force an end to the anti-union attacks and the immoral, unwinnable wars in Afghanistan and Iraq! $ For Jobs, Education, Healthcare
    Not War!

    Posted by Pancho Valdez, 03/08/2011 12:49pm (3 years ago)

RSS feed for comments on this page | RSS feed for all comments