Guns, profits and Sandy Hook

enough 520x300

It took the massacre of 20 children and six adults at an elementary school in Connecticut for the country to - we hope - get serious about regulating guns. That is a huge price to pay. The horrendous crime at Sandy Hook Elementary School in Newtown, Conn., was the 16th mass murder in the United States this year. The 16th! This number does not include the gun violence that occurs in our cities and towns daily.

The nation has hit bottom with regard to gun violence. Perhaps, finally, it can admit out loud, "We have a gun problem."

We agree with those who note that preventing mass killings and violence is complex and multi-sided. Universal mental health access is certainly a piece of the puzzle. Ending promotion of militarism in an increasingly violent culture is another.

But the mass bloodshed could not happen without the widespread availability of guns, and increasingly lethal ones, both legally and illegally. The question is: Will we be able to pull together a broad enough coalition to confront and curb those who profit from manufacturing and dealing in these individual weapons of mass destruction?

Much discussion rightly focuses on the National Rifle Association and its power. It and related groups are often referred to as "the gun lobby."

The NRA gun lobby is strategically aligned with political, economic and social forces grouped around the Republican Party and far-right elements. For example, the ultra-right, anti-labor Koch Brothers fund the American Legislative Exchange Council, which has successfully written and passed NRA-backed state laws that allow concealed weapons, guns at schools and "shoot-to-kill" defense - such as Florida's infamous Stand Your Ground law that George Zimmerman hid behind when he murdered teenager Trayvon Martin in Sanford, Fla.

The NRA and its related associations claim to represent individual gun owners and hunters. But no matter how many gun owners are members of "gun lobby" organizations, that is NOT who these organizations truly represent. Who they truly represent are the multi-billion-dollar arms industry - the manufacturers and dealers (Walmart is the nation's top gun seller) of death and destruction. It's an industry - backed by Wall Street - whose only interest is keeping those profits high. Major gun manufacturers are owned by big Wall Street players. Bushmaster, maker of the rifle used by the Newtown killer, is one of several firearm makes owned by the powerful Cerberus Capital Management. With the public outcry after the Newtown massacre, Cerberus announced it would sell its firearm holdings. The Wall Street Journal reported corporations are looking "to distance themselves from guns and gun makers amid a public outcry." But unless there is a sustained public movement to curb guns as a source of profit, the corporate profit drive will continue to push guns to make money.

How do corporations keep profits high? One way is to increase demand. That's where the "gun lobby" steps in. Shrouded in the most right-wing interpretation of the Constitution, the gun lobby peddles fear, racism and paranoia to the American public to pump up gun sales. They say, protect yourself from crime, from the government, from Obama, from Black people, from Mexicans and the Chinese, from economic collapse and apocalypse, from you name it. Unfortunately millions of people buy into it - and buy guns and assault weapons. News media have reported the killer's mother had guns because she was a "prepper," part of a movement that is preparing for economic catastrophe. Newtown itself was a victim of the "gun lobby," which blocked a local law enforcement initiative to bar people from shooting their weapons within 500 feet of a home.

There are billions of profits being made in the legal civilian gun trade. (Not to mention in military and law enforcement weapons sales.) Corporations also profit from the illegal gun trade. Banks, most recently HSBC, have been found to launder drug and gun-trafficking money to the tune of billions in profits. Guns and drugs go hand in hand with the high numbers of shootings in Chicago and other cities.

There are common sense first steps that can be taken to begin to rein in the powerful and destructive gun lobby. Ban assault weapons and high capacity bullet clips to start. That will send a message to the gun profiteers - and the country as a whole - that public safety comes before corporate profits.

Photo: image used in vigils across the country in the wake of the Sandy Hook massacre. (Moveon/FB)

Post your comment

Comments are moderated. See guidelines here.


  • I can't help draw the analogy to a remark that I remember from the 1960's.
    It goes somthing like this: "when America hangs itself, they will surely do so, using the very rope that was sold to them by a money hungry captalist"

    Of course, the NRA is largely sponsored by the weapons manufacturers, making huge profits....where hundreds of thousands of dollars are pumped into Pro-Gun propaganda using the most basic and effective scare tactic....Paranoia & Fear.( fear of the have-nots, fear of the Latinos, fear of the unemployed, fear of the Muslims, fear of the Blacks...and ultimately fear of your neighbour, because he does not think like you)
    I remember visiting countries behind the Iron Curtain, in the 1970's. The streets were safe! Only the soldiers were armed!

    Posted by jules, 04/08/2013 11:14pm (2 years ago)

  • When guns are in the hands of good people who know their basic gun safety, everybody benefits. A well-armed society is a very polite society. It is not the law-abiding citizens who commit gun crimes rampantly, it is the criminals. It is truly dangerous when stupid and/or ignorant people (like the author of this editorial) handle firearms.

    And also, did the author of this editorial have to throw down the race card in order to label gun owners and gun manufacturers as evil, racist, and dangerous people? Classic liberal tactics.

    We need our Second Amendment rights in order to protect our First Amendment rights. People doubt that the government will violate our First Amendment rights but look at the man who made the video that "infuriated the people in Libya enough to attack the Embassy," the man is still in jail even though the Obama administration used this as a cover-up for their own negligence. Where are his rights?

    Posted by Jake, 02/07/2013 8:06pm (3 years ago)

  • So if a person steals his mothers car and drives in a crowd of people and kills them, we should blame the car manufactuers?

    Posted by jeff, 12/24/2012 11:58pm (3 years ago)

  • Oklahoma City Bomber Timothy McVeigh used a Ryder truck along with fertilizer and deisel fuel to claim the lives of 168 innocent people in 1995. Can you still rent a Ryder truck, buy fertilizer and deisel fuel today?

    Posted by jeff, 12/22/2012 4:17am (3 years ago)

  • How is it that if someone commits a crime like this in another country is called a "terrorist". But an American who commits this crime is someone with a mental disorder?

    Posted by simon, 12/20/2012 10:46pm (3 years ago)

  • You actually have a school security problem here, not a gun problem. Stopping the sales of assault type rifles is not going to stop the next crazy American from doing the same with a small handgun. How stupid can you Americans really be trying to fix the problems in the Middle East when you can't even handle a school security issue in your own country.

    Posted by harvey, 12/20/2012 10:34pm (3 years ago)

  • The United States Government can send troops to Iraq and Afganistan, but can't put a Police officer in every schhol in their own county? Then you wonder why foreign countries around the World are calling Americans and their polititians idiots.

    Posted by harvey, 12/20/2012 7:20pm (3 years ago)

  • Connecting the dots.... making people aware of the truth about these gun lobbyists. Who they really represent.
    And what it befalls upon the working families in America.


    Posted by Gabriel Falsetta, 12/19/2012 2:47pm (3 years ago)

RSS feed for comments on this page | RSS feed for all comments