Health care reform goes down to the wire


Public fatigue and disillusionment, plus hostile opposition from Big Insurance and far-right ideologues are what President Obama has to overcome in order to rally enough "yes" votes in the House of Representatives for his health care reform plan.

(UPDATE March 9, 2010: March and rally in Washington, DC at Big Insurance meeting. Follow AFL-CIO Now blog coverage and Twitter.)

Many analysts say this vote could "make or break" the presidency. In his weekly New York Times column, Frank Rich soberly places it as a "do-or-die moment" not just for health care, but for Obama's presidency, which could be "toast" if reform fails to pass. 

While Big Insurance and the far-right argue the American people are against Obama's plan because it's a "government takeover," polls show otherwise.

The recently cited McClatchy/Ipsos poll reports forty seven percent of those polled were opposed to the "health care reform proposal being discussed." Forty-one percent are in favor.

But as Barry Sussman of the Nieman Watchdog Project, a Harvard-based journalism group, points out in his article, "McClatchy survey finds huge support - 2 to 1 - for health care reform," the pollsters asked a follow-up question, which turns the numbers on its head.

A stunning 2-1 supermajority is in favor of health care reform, Sussman writes, because 37 percent against the current proposal says it doesn't "go far enough to reform health care."

But how to mobilize that fatigued supermajority to pressure their congress people is a challenge grassroots health care groups are trying to meet.

"Talking Health Care" Sung and shot on the West Side of Cleveland:

In November, the House had 220 votes in favor of the bill. Since then some Democrats are out of the picture (Rep. John Murtha died, Rep Eric Massa resigned). House Speaker Pelosi needs 216 votes to pass the Senate version of the bill, and media reports claim the House has 212 "yes" votes as of March 5. Pelosi says she is going to have enough votes to win the vote later this month.

The president's appearance in Philadelphia today, March 8, may be about swinging at least one previous "no" vote to a "yes" vote. Pennsylvania Representative Jason Altmire, who was part of the 39 Democrats that voted for the Stupak Amendment has to decide whether the Senate anti-abortion language is "strong enough" versus having the status quo on health care. He said recently, "In the end, I have to make a decision between passing this bill. This is the finish line-or doing nothing."

In Illinois, Campaign for Better Health Care has been rallying at reluctant congressional representatives' offices, Republican and Democrat, to "Get It Done." On March 11, the group is rallying outside Democratic Rep. Dan Lipinski office and leaving shoes representing the Illinoisans who have died prematurely from lack of health care or have been denied because of a pre-existing condition.

In Cleveland, Ohio, a Facebook-based campaign to get Rep. Dennis Kucinich to vote for the plan is underway. The group called "100,000 Clevelanders Urge Dennis, Vote for Pres. Obama's Health Care bill" is be made up of Kucinich supporters who disagree with the congressman's "all or nothing" approach to health care. Kucinich was one of two progressives who voted against the House bill last November.

Kucinich said that bill did not go far enough, and supports a single-payer only approach. The group says, "Today, there are nearly 100,000 Cleveland area residents uninsured in U.S. Representative Dennis Kucinich's 10th District. We urge him to vote for President Obama's health care reform."

A call to his Washington office today confirmed that Kucinich is still planning to vote "no."

Photo: Rep. Jason Altmire speaks at the AFL-CIO's Working America forum in 2008.  Molly Theobald/aflcio2008/CC



Post your comment

Comments are moderated. See guidelines here.


  • The other day I voted No for Obama's health plan in a survey taken by Move On. My reason was that I would be forced to buy insurance from one of the insurance corporations. I am low income and would be subsidized but I can't see guaranteeing 30,000,000 captive subscribers to fatten the profits of corporate thieves. The survey aske you to make a comment and also let you read the comments of others. Every comment was along the lines that there was no public option.

    JWithout a public option there is no incentive for big insurance to mend their ways.

    Posted by Mark A. Luciano, 03/11/2010 9:33pm (6 years ago)

  • I believe that Congressman Kucinich is correct in his position. The pending bills in the Senate and the House will fail to do the following: 1) extend coverage to those who cannot afford health insurance. Instead there are provisions to fine people who do not sign up for it!
    2) The pending bills do not force the HMOs and other health insurance corporations to provide coverage for services/care to people with "pre-existing" conditions
    such as cancer, diabetes, mental illness, etc. 3) Neither bill provides for penalties to the healthcare insurances that fail to approve needed prescribed treatments. 4) Both bills instead of exposing the healthcare insurance monopolies as being the culprits for our current crisis, provides them with guaranteed profits at our expense.
    5) Neither bill provides for REAL healthcare reform, instead provides weak, health insurance "reform'.

    Given the above, where is the progress in getting this passed? Even with the Democrats including the President caving into the insurance bosses, the right wingers still oppose the legislation as weak as it is. The President and Democrats should have stood their ground and at least pushed for a public option. NO BILL IS BETTER THAN A SELLOUT BILL!

    Posted by Pancho Valdez, 03/11/2010 6:13pm (6 years ago)

RSS feed for comments on this page | RSS feed for all comments