Inequality, a growing national crisis

tax the rich2

DETROIT - Democracy came out a winner in Michigan's elections when Republican Gov. Snyder's Emergency Manager (EM) law went down to defeat in a statewide referendum. The law, which allowed the governor to replace local elected officials with "financial dictators," was rejected in 77 of 83 counties from the far reaches of the Upper Peninsula to Michigan's Indiana border.

However, that great victory is already in jeopardy. It is being reported Republican lawmakers are drafting new legislation for a revised EM law.

So much for the will of the people.

Detroit is again in the crosshairs. A Detroit News columnist attributes the city's budget crisis to the "dysfunction" of the city's "political class." Such disparaging characterizations aimed at this majority African American city shows racism plays a major role in how the city is viewed.

It is not surprising that the city is in financial distress. The downsizing of Detroit's auto dependent economy and corporate decisions to move jobs out of the city, state and country would send any city into a tailspin.

In addition, a Wall Street and banking caused housing crisis resulted in foreclosures, vacancies and a further erosion of the tax base.

Nor is this solely an urban problem. In Michigan, both suburban and rural areas of the state face tough economic times and many have been threatened with the appointment of EM's if they don't buckle down and slash their budgets.

But are budget deficits the main problem Detroit and our nation face? Jared Bernstein in a recent AFL-CIO blog article says the real crisis we are facing in the nation is not deficits but the growing inequality between the rich and poor. He writes that the national deficit averaged five percent in the mid-80s, rose to 10 percent during the great recession but is now 7 percent and falling.

In other words, it doesn't sound like a national emergency.

The article then talks about a real danger that has been growing for some time. Since the early 1980's we've transferred fifteen percent of our national income from the bottom ninety percent of households to the top ten percent.

The main problem we face as a nation is not a lack of money; the problem is too much of it is in too few hands. Austerity measures and budget cuts will only widen the inequality gap by eliminating needed jobs and services for working people.

There are solutions to both fixing deficits and lessening income inequality and you don't have to be a rocket scientist to figure them out.

A tax structure based on trickle down has not worked. Rates need to be increased for the top brackets. A start would be to let the Bush era tax cuts to the wealthy expire. Billionaire and investor Warren Buffet agrees.

Secondly, the military budget is bloated way beyond what is needed to defend our nation. Much of it goes to large corporations whose interests, at home and abroad, have more to do with making profits than providing security.

Military spending eats up a whopping sixty percent of our national budget and widens the inequality gap by gobbling up money that would better be used to rebuild our nation's cities and rural areas. Only 7 percent of national spending goes for health and human services, six percent for education and a mere five percent is distributed to the states.

What would make our nation more democratic and its people more secure? The choices really are not that difficult. We need to tax the rich, cut the military budget and shift money toward rebuilding our cities and towns and the infrastructure of our nation.

Photo: keegstra // CC 2.0

Post your comment

Comments are moderated. See guidelines here.


  • I couldn't agree more. And I think the majority of people agree with you. The problem - an entrenched GOP. They have gerrymandered districts so badly, that it is all but impossible to oust them. Far too many people in those districts vote Republican as a knee jerk reaction to preserve a Party that is no longer viable nor revelent. I have only half jokingly said that some would vote for the devil himself as long as he had an R by his name. Many in the GOP - today - buy into that BS they promote. But I have to believe that some are not insane - that some are not totally and irretreivably brainwashed. So how do you "reach them"?? Figure that one out and we can solve this delima.

    Posted by micheal w smith, 11/30/2012 2:03pm (2 years ago)

  • The cities suffer when so much is spent on the military. Yet local elected officials rarely consider their responsibility for saving their cities to demand that their Congress members and the President cut the military and put the funds to creating jobs, rebuilding infrastructure and addressing human needs. In New Haven, CT, voters passed a referendum calling on just these moves with 85% support. In Massachusetts, voters in 91 towns passed related budget questions. These do not at all automatically translate into action by our representatives in Washington. Furthermore, we need to deal with saving and converting the existing jobs in the military industrial sector to producing not destructive weaponry but things the country needs. So - we need strategies for building the coalitions among the labor, peace and environmental activists to identify what skilled workers in the military industries can craft to provide civilian rather than war items, move these industries to producing green products in green ways, insist that the unemployed and vets get jobs rebuilding our infrastructure an press our elected officials to vote to move the money.

    Posted by HenryCT, 11/30/2012 11:06am (2 years ago)

RSS feed for comments on this page | RSS feed for all comments