Millennials see Keystone as more than just a pipeline

keystone520x300 2

The Keystone pipeline proposal has hit a Nebraska stop sign, but it has deeper problems than right-of-way issues across the United States. After all, the controversial proposal for transporting Canada's tar sands was never just about the pipeline. Just ask the thousand students who rallied in front of the White House recently and were willing to be arrested to make their point.

Frustrated and angry over a lack of political action on climate change, our Millennial Generation is not tolerating an ineffectual Congress or president. This 18-34 year old group in the United States is 74 million strong and when the worst happens will suffer the most from climate change. With little representation in Congress, where the average age is 60, they are looking to civil disobedience as a strategy to create the political will to address this threat. This will happen not only in our nation's capitol but on the streets of major cities across the nation.

The fight over Keystone is really about a generational shift in our energy paradigm and how we will survive the 21st century. It concerns the wealth and jobs that the fossil fuels industry creates, how it has weaved itself into all of our lives and pulled us into a formidable dependency. With a growing foreboding, however, we are sensing our carbon lifestyle may be lethal to future generations and if they are to survive it is incumbent on us to accelerate efforts to develop other energy sources.

From Washington, D.C. and Nebraska courts, this conflict now swings to Canada, where the Alberta government owns 81 percent of its oil sands and has a long list of investment partners. Besides multinational corporations, one of its biggest sources of investment capital for mining is China, our planet's largest producer of greenhouse gases. Alberta looks to collect $1.2 trillion in royalties from its oil sands over the next 35 years, but has increasingly drawn the world's attention because of the massive girth of pollution from the mining and burning of bitumen tar.

Canada also faces a disenfranchised youth, who feel their voices and futures have been diminished by the enormous profits bitumen tar sands portend. They are joined by First Nations aboriginal tribes who share the same political paucity and frustration. Despite the economic benefits of bitumen tar mining on their lands, First Nations people are taking a grim view of irreversible health and cultural damage. It is a seminal decision for First Nations to continue its relationship with Canadian oil interests and on a larger scale, analogous with our world's factious accord on reducing the role of fossil fuels in our lives.

The world's climate scientists essentially agree that if left unchecked, anthropogenic CO2 will worsen extreme weather, raise sea levels and create mass extinctions from a profuse array of environmental changes. Many acknowledge that climate deniers are fed propagated ignorance by fossil fuel strategists as part of a misinformation campaign, creating a set of beliefs not easily changed. It creates a polarized electorate, leaving the issue to develop worst-case scenarios before action is taken.

In moderation, fossil fuel usage might not have posed a serious threat, but we have moved well past that threshold. Our burning of fossil fuels produces around 33.4 billion metric tons of CO2 per year and world energy needs are expected to rise about 40 percent over the next 20 years. CO2 has reached proportions in our atmosphere not seen for about 15 million years and many scientists warn it may already be too late to mitigate damages.

There is a way forward. In time, renewables can generate jobs lost in the fossil fuels industry and will sustain our lifestyles. We can consider Generation IV nuclear energy, reportedly much safer than existing technology. Some strategists look to a carbon fee and dividend system that can increase the viability of new renewable energy sources, as well as a carbon import tax on products from other countries.

As Keystone falters and tar sands mining provokes mounting protests, our nation is compelled to end political bickering and accede Millennials a more powerful voice on climate legislation. President Obama must grasp the significance of this moment, deny the Keystone permit and tell the world his decision has nothing to do with the pipeline and everything to do with leadership.

Jeffrey Meyer is a writer and volunteer for 350.org and Citizens Climate Lobby.

Photo: Students rally in front of the White House in March demanding that President Obama stop the Keystone XL pipeline.

Post your comment

Comments are moderated. See guidelines here.

Comments

  • You could also go about it from another angle to persuade the American people: - Why should we help this natural resource leave our continent??!! Why should America help this oil arrive in China??! We could, ironically, use the very emotion of greed to persuade voters to block Keystone XL's approval. Frame it as supplying foreign powers and the opinion polls will begin to shift

    Posted by T, 04/18/2014 3:09pm (11 months ago)

  • The environmental argument is solid. However, I also think taking it from another angle would be persuasive to the American people: - Why would the U.S. want to let this oil off the continent ?! Why would we want to help the oil reach China?! Ironically, maybe we could use the emotion of greed to persuade the American populace that Keystone XL is giving away our oil and thus shift the opinion against it.

    Posted by T, 04/18/2014 3:06pm (11 months ago)

  • It’s been science’s 32 years of 95% certainty climate change “could be” a crisis and have a full 100% certainty the planet is not flat, smoking will cause cancer and evolution is proven. It’s not a crisis until science says so, not a goose stepping mob of climate blame “believers”.

    Posted by MajorPain, 04/09/2014 1:18pm (11 months ago)

RSS feed for comments on this page | RSS feed for all comments