Mine workers stay neutral in presidential race

miners4

The United Mine Workers union is staying neutral, so far, in the presidential race between Democratic incumbent Barack Obama and presumed GOP nominee Mitt Romney, the union's spokesman has told Press Associates Union News Service.

"We have not endorsed anyone in the presidential election and have no plans to do so at this time," communications director Phil Smith said in an email in mid-June. Mine Workers President Cecil Roberts was "not in Florida when the AFL-CIO endorsement was made," he added, due to a death in Roberts' family.

The governing council of the union's campaign finance committee, or PAC, backed Smith's comment and added Romney is unacceptable so far, too.

"Neither candidate has yet demonstrated he will be on the side of UMWA members and their families as president. We will continue to examine the candidates' positions on all issues of importance to our members and American working families as the campaign progresses," its statement said.

The Mine Workers move is important. The union, while smaller than in its heyday under legendary leader John L. Lewis, still has influence among miners, their families, and its retirees - who now outnumber active UMWA members - in Kentucky, western Pennsylvania, West Virginia, and southern Illinois, among other states.

Ironically, Roberts' predecessor is AFL-CIO President Richard Trumka, who called for the federation's endorsement of Obama at the union leaders' executive council meeting. Trumka, despite differences with the president, backs Obama.

While neither Smith nor the PAC committee elaborated on Obama's failings, Roberts had a few choice words for the president's Environmental Protection Agency in a local radio interview several weeks ago in West Virginia.

"The Navy SEALs shot Osama Bin Laden in Pakistan and" EPA administrator "Lisa Jackson shot us in Washington," he told MetroNews Talkline. Roberts said Jackson's EPA is proposing new anti-pollution rules that would effectively end construction of any new coal-fired electric power plants in the U.S.

The Mine Workers' stand makes them one of two unions known to have taken no position, officially or unofficially, on the presidential race. The other is the United Brotherhood of Carpenters, an independent union.

Photo: Mine workers in Pittsburgh. America's Power // CC 2.0

Post your comment

Comments are moderated. See guidelines here.

Comments

  • Unfortunately, until we are able to actually create green jobs that can truly impact on the lives of poor, working folks, this situation will be repeated over and over and over again. As with steelworkers, autoworkers & other industrial workers who've been thrown out of work, the promises of 'better, greener jobs,' etc, will ring hollow until they can actually see them put dollars in their pockets. It is wrong-headed, goes ultimately against their real interests, but all poor folks can see when hurting is the possibility of work and a potential paycheck. A Romney presidency & GOP congress, offering the worst of crumbs off the table will see this negative behavior multiple many-fold.

    Posted by bruce bostick, 06/18/2012 2:39pm (3 years ago)

  • Sorry, but I'm with the EPA in this one. I understand that coal miners are suffering, but mountain top removal and carbon emissions carry tremendous costs to all of us. Coal-fired electrical production needs to be phased out before more permanent damage is done to the environment. Sorry, coal miners, but it's the truth.

    Posted by pinkjohn, 06/15/2012 7:12pm (3 years ago)

RSS feed for comments on this page | RSS feed for all comments