New postal union leader seeks to halt latest privatization scheme

lettercarrier520x310

WASHINGTON (PAI) - As far as Mark Dimondstein is concerned, the members of the Postal Workers are going to be out in the streets even more than they already are.

Their causes? Increasing revenues for the Postal Service, stopping its creeping privatization, via Staples stores, by the Postmaster General, keeping well-paid middle-class union jobs, and enacting a plan - back to the future - that could earn the USPS almost $9 billion yearly by letting its branches be postal savings banks.

Dimondstein and his slate unseated incumbent APWU President Cliff Guffey and his allies in a contested election last year. Key issues in the vote included Guffey's management and ineffective APWU lobbying on postal "reform" legislation.

But for Dimondstein, there's a third threat: The agency's scheme to staff post offices in Staples stores, using low-paid Staples workers, and not well-paid USPS workers. "The secret Staples deal is at the expense of the people of this country," Dimondstein declares. "It's privatization, piece by piece.

"If you put post offices in Staples stores and pay the workers $8 or $9 an hour, it'll lead to closing post offices and a shift to non-union poverty-wage jobs from living-wage union jobs," he told Press Associates Union News Service in an extensive interview.

APWU's new activism against the Staples shift, which the Postal Service has described as a "pilot program" for cooperation with other retailers, has already begun. Protests in Florida, Northern California, Atlanta, Pittsburgh and elsewhere drew high-profile media attention and shone a spotlight on the USPS plan.

"The idea is to have ongoing sustained protests everywhere, capped by a National Day of Action" on the privatization issue, Dimondstein adds. The events, he hopes, "will create a grand alliance" between APWU, its members and all Americans.

The postmaster general justifies the Staples deal as one way to cut USPS personnel costs, and reduce its red ink. Though the USPS has been running a profit on first-class mail for more than a year, it's also run billions of dollars in the red overall.

That's because the Republican-run Congress in 2006 imposed a $5.5 billion yearly payment requirement on USPS for a decade, forcing it to pre-fund future retirees' health care for the next 75 years. Lawmakers also refused to let the USPS recoup past pension overpayments, worth billions more, deposited in federal accounts.

The APWU, the Letter Carriers, the Mail Handlers (a Laborers sector) and the Rural Letter Carriers are all lobbying for total repeal of the health care pre-funding. USPS health care is now overfunded. But lawmakers have been cool to their pleas. Even the latest postal "reform" legislation, S1486, only reduces the pre-funding. That's one reason the unions oppose the bill. There are others, Dimondstein adds.

"S1486 pushes privatization by inference," he says. "If you talk about doing away with six-day pickup and delivery and eliminate private sidewalk service" to individual mailboxes, that lower service "will drive customers into" private package delivery.

Nevertheless, the unions realize USPS must both adapt to the Internet age and make money. They back alternative legislation, by Sen. Bernie Sanders, Ind.-Vt., to open new lines of business for USPS, such as housing notary public offices, issuing fishing and hunting licenses and shipping goods now barred from the mails.

Sanders would also end the healthcare prefunding and let USPS recoup the pension overpayments. Based on a recent USPS Inspector General's report, Dimondstein adds another idea: Let the USPS run a postal savings bank.

When USPS was still the federally run Post Office, it ran a postal savings system through the early 1960s. Such a system would extend banking services to underserved rural areas and inner cities and would bring in $8.9 billion yearly, the IG says.

The IG report notes "one in four U.S. households," with some 68 million adults, "live at least partially outside the financial mainstream - without bank accounts or using costly services like payday lenders. The average underserved household spends $2,412 each year just on interest and fees for alternative financial services.

"Postal financial services may appeal to many customers who feel abandoned by major financial institutions. Postal organizations have an unmatched ability to reach consumers from diverse backgrounds," the IG adds. "Financial services have been the single best new opportunity for" postal services worldwide "to earn additional revenue," the report concludes.

Dimondstein concurs, which is why APWU pushes the postal savings plan in its talks with Sanders and other lawmakers. Says Dimondstein: "It's a very important concept. We're talking about basic banking" such as no-fee checking, small loans and pre-paid cards. "Not only do 30 percent of all zip codes have no banking services, but another 29 percent have only one" bank outlet. "So people are forced into payday loans and in going to loan sharks." But all those zip codes have post offices, the IG report notes.

"The IG says the Postal Service has the right to do all this without legislation," Dimondstein says. "And a lot of members of Congress want them to do it

Photo: National Association of Letter Carriers Facebook page.

Post your comment

Comments are moderated. See guidelines here.

Comments

  • I'd love to see savings accounts at post offices. Hopefully, it would shut down payday lenders (aka loan sharks) overnight.

    Posted by Laura Dewey, 03/11/2014 12:40pm (10 months ago)


  • Vanguard journalist Chris Hedges and economist Richard Wolfe provides us with tremendous resources towards understanding our daily societal and economic conundrums. Worth checking out.

    Posted by Roland Petit, 03/11/2014 11:24am (10 months ago)

  • Smart thinking. Good article.

    Posted by Tenzin Angmo, 03/10/2014 6:36pm (10 months ago)

  • Revolutionary articles like this prove that capitalism is "coming home to roost" and will not stop until all workers are on welfare. As Fidel has said about the debt crisis in Latin American countries during the Reagan era when the US became a debtor nation, "things don't change until they come to a crisis". Times, indeed, are "a changing".

    Posted by Richard Grassl, 03/10/2014 1:48pm (10 months ago)

RSS feed for comments on this page | RSS feed for all comments