NRA fights for right to torture pigeons

pic53

Take a pigeon.

Now put that pigeon, along with thousands of others, into small coops that don't give the bird much freedom to move.

Don't worry about food or water. It won't matter.

Take some of the pigeons - who are already disoriented from hours, maybe days, of confinement - and place a couple of them each into spring-loaded box traps on a field.

About 20 yards behind the traps have people with 12-gauge shotguns line up.

Release the pigeons and watch juveniles disguised in the bodies of adults shoot these non-threatening birds. Most of the birds will be shot five to ten feet from the traps; many, dazed and confused, are shot while standing on the ground or on the tops of cages. Each shooter will have the opportunity to shoot at 25 birds, five birds each in five separate rounds.

About a fourth of the birds will be killed outright. Most of the rest will be wounded. Teenagers will race onto the fields and grab most of the wounded birds. They will wring their necks or stuff them still alive into barrels to die from suffocation.

Some birds will be able to fly outside the killing field, only to die a slow and painful death in nearby yards, roofs or rivers. A few will live.

Now, do it again. And again. And again. All day long. At the "state shoot" in Berks County, about 5,000 birds were launched from 27 boxes on three killing fields.

And, just to make sure that you're a macho macho man, why not stuff a bird onto a plastic fork and parade around the grounds? How about wearing a t-shirt with language so nauseating that even Cable TV would have to blur the message?

By the way, make sure you collect your bets. Illegal gambling, along with excessive drinking, is also a part of this charade that poses as sport. The shooters don't make much, but thousands of dollars will exchange hands.

These are the same psychopaths who probably twirled cats by their tails, and used birthday money to buy BB guns to pluck birds from fences and telephone wires. In their warped minds, they probably think they're Rambo, their shotguns are M-16s, the cages are bunkers, and the cooing birds are agents of Kaos, Maxwell Smart's long-time nemesis.

This is what the NRA is defending as Americans' Second Amendment rights. And why the Pennsylvania legislature has been afraid to pass a bill prohibiting pigeon shoots.

For more than three decades, Pennsylvanians have tried to get this practice banned. For three decades, they have failed. And when it looked as if there was even a remote chance that a slim majority of legislators might support a bill banning pigeon shoots, the House and Senate leadership, most of them from rural Pennsylvania, figured out numerous ways to lock up the bills in committees or keep them from reaching the floor for a vote. In 1994, the House did vote, 99-93, to ban pigeon shoots. But 102 votes were needed.

But now a bill to ban this form of animal cruelty may be headed for a vote in the full legislature. SB 626, sponsored by State Sen. Patrick Browne, R-Allentown, forbids the "use of live animals or fowl for targets at trap shoots or block shoot" gatherings. It specifically allows fair-chase hunting and protects Second Amendment rights.

Last week, the Senate Judiciary Committee finally got a spine, and voted 11-3 to send legislation to the full Senate to ban this practice. Six Republicans and five Democrats voted for the vote; all three negative votes were from Republicans, including the Senate's president pro-tempore. Many of those voting for the ban are lifetime hunters; many are longtime NRA members. They all agree that this is not fair chase hunting but wanton animal cruelty.

But, the NRA, with its paranoid personality that believes banning animal cruelty would lead to banning guns, fired back. In a vicious letter to its members and the media, the NRA stated that national animal rights extremists, whom they have also called radicals, are trying to ban what they call a "longstanding traditional shooting sport."

The International Olympic Committee and the Pennsylvania Game Commission disagree. In 1900, the Olympic committee banned pigeon shoots as cruelty to animals and ruled it was not a sport. The game commission says that pigeon shoots "are not what we would classify as fair-chase hunting." Also opposed to pigeon shoots are dozens of apparently other radical extremists - like the Humane Society of the United States, the American Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals, the Pennsylvania Council of Churches, the Pennsylvania Veterinary Medical Association, and the Pennsylvania Bar Association. "Each pigeon shoot teaches children that violence and animal cruelty are acceptable practices," says Heidi Prescott, senior vice-president for the Humane Society.

The vote will be close in both chambers, mostly because of the financial power the NRA wields in the rural parts of Pennsylvania, and the NRA's fingernails-on-the-blackboard screeches to its members. On his blog, State Sen. Daylin Leach, D-King of Prussia, a member of the Judiciary committee, wrote that when he supported a ban on pigeon shoots in previous Legislative sessions, he "got more hate mail on this than any other issue I've been involved with." He stated he "got e-mails from all over the state telling me that I obviously hated America and that God, who wanted the pigeons he created to be slaughtered as quickly as possible, was very disappointed in me."

Failure to pass this bill into law will continue to make Pennsylvania, with a long-established hunting culture, the only state where pigeon shoots openly occur, and where animal cruelty is accepted.

Image: Pennsylvania is the only state to allow brave men hunt these terrifying creatures. Chris Isherwood // CC BY-SA 2.0

Post your comment

Comments are moderated. See guidelines here.

Comments

  • You shoot it, you eat it.

    Posted by Trailer Trash, 05/02/2011 5:24pm (4 years ago)

  • I have not heard about this issue from any NRA source.
    I cannot pass judgement until I get more info.

    That said, there are operations out there that do these things and it just isn't fair chase.

    A lot of folks I know depend on wild game for their protein. Hunters and NRA members do a lot to promote wildlife management. The NRA also does a great deal to promote responsible gun ownership.

    As far as Robert Bork, there are numerous writings from our founders that refute his understanding of the Second Amendment.




    Posted by MIke Greer, 04/28/2011 4:07am (4 years ago)

  • Sorry, I meant lessons not leasons in my last comment.

    Posted by Jim, 04/27/2011 1:02pm (4 years ago)

  • You ought to be asamed of yourself Walter. A bigger load of BS I never did read. Have you been taking libtard leasons from the diggbot libtards at Digg?

    Posted by Jim, 04/27/2011 12:53pm (4 years ago)

  • This Is Sooo Cruel, No Sport About It!!!!!!!!!! Wake Up People, This Should Not Even Be Considered A Vote.... Just Simply STOP The Asinine KILLING Of Precious Life!!!!!!!!!!!

    Posted by , 04/27/2011 11:05am (4 years ago)

  • Hey RDC,
    You forgot to mention that the 2nd Amendment was ruled an individual right in Heller and was ruled to apply to the States in Mcdonald. So I don't care what Robert Bork said the Supreme Court has ruled on it. On a side note I personally would not participate in a pigeon shoot and I am an NRA member.

    Posted by Mike Ebel, 04/27/2011 10:49am (4 years ago)

  • The bizarre NRA view of the Second Amendment has been crtiticized by Robert Bork, who has stated for years that the amendment merely guarantees a right to participate in a government militia.

    Posted by RDC, 04/26/2011 1:56pm (4 years ago)

RSS feed for comments on this page | RSS feed for all comments