Obama administration plans to push organizing rights


Private employers will be required to post large signs informing workers about their right to form unions under a new rule the Obama administration plans to institute by executive order.

The plan received less than the amount of publicity that might have been expected because it was announced the week before Christmas when the main focus of the news was on the legislative battles in Congress.

The National Labor Relations Board plans to issue a rule requiring almost all employers to post notices in employee break rooms or other prominent spots that explain workers' rights to bargain collectively, distribute union literature or engage in other union activity without reprisal.

In the past the NLRB usually made policy on a case-by-case basis during labor-management disputes.

The decision to issue the new order steps up even further the more aggressively pro-labor role the board has played during the Obama administration.

The president first signaled his determination to strengthen the board's role in protecting organizing rights when he made several recess appointments to give the NLRB its first Democratic majority in ten years.

The recess appointments were made because because the presiden't candidates were held up for months over GOP claims that a former AFL-CIO lawyer, Craig Becker, would be too pro-union.

The administration's new rule is opposed by big business which sees it as an attempt to achieve, by executive order, some of what labor and its allies have not been able to achieve on the legislative front. Republican filibusters have blocked passage of the Employee Free Choice Act, which would make it easier to form unions. The EFCA would allow workers to form a union as soon as a majority sign cards expressing their desire to be in a union.

Others who oppose the rule see it as a step in the direction of reversing a long-term decline in union membership. Only 7.2 percent of the natioon's work force is now unionized. Anti-union forces fear that widespread knowledge of union organizing rights will begin to reverse that trend.

The rule will not take effect until late February. From now until then, the NLRB is taking comments.

In a statement last week the NLRB said, "Many employees protected by the National Labor Relations Act are unaware of their rights under the law."

The posters private employers will be required to display are similar to those already required in the offices of government contractors and subcontractors ever since a June executive order issued by the Obama administration.

Michael Eastman, executive director of labor policy for the U.S. Chamber of Commerce, is already leading the charge against the rule, telling the press that the NLRB lacks the "legal authority" to issue such a rule.

Attorneys for the chamber and for companies opposed to the rule are telling their clients that the regulation amounts to "government sanctioning" of unions.

AFL-CIO President Richard Trumka said the rule is "a common-sense policy necessary because there is widespread lack of understanding of the law and because many workers are justifiably fearful of exercising their rights."


Post your comment

Comments are moderated. See guidelines here.


  • many workers are just too afraid that they will take anything just to keep their jobs, and for those who speak up are labeled troublemakers? how do i know this? you are speaking to one!!!! pto time taken away,putting it together with sick, so really sick people would lose out,no vacation time, burning the good workers out by overworking them till they just leave? unions where are you? thanks for listening.

    Posted by maria gainey, 01/04/2011 7:34pm (4 years ago)

  • I hardly think American voters could give a rat's ass what the U.S. Chamber of Commerce thinks since it's been revealed they use foreign money to fund U.S. Senate campaigns.

    Posted by curtis morrison, 01/04/2011 1:12am (4 years ago)

  • The proposed rule is here:


    Comments accepted through February 22. Predictably, most of the comments so far are hostile.

    This is an exceedingly mild rule change. Most people do not read those posters. I hope bigger and better things are coming soon, not least shorter election periods.

    Posted by Felix Dzerzhinsky, 01/03/2011 3:03pm (4 years ago)

  • I used to ask, "Where are the Communists when we need them?" And now that I am one (finally), I ask, where are the unions when we need them? We need unions now more than ever. My new year's goal is to become more involved with my union. May that be yours, too.

    Posted by Jim Morehouse, 01/02/2011 10:17pm (4 years ago)

  • I grew up in an environment that was opposed to unions. The message I heard as a child was that "Unions are a form of Group Think".

    I have learned the truth as an adult. Unions are a vehicle to support the independent worker in a collective environment. Without unions, an individual worker is alone against the combined forces of corporate management. The worker does not stand a chance without the union.

    I have seen workers in one specialty support workers from an entirely different specialty. Unions also open the members up to a source of information that most workers never find out about.

    I am proud to be e union member, and I look forward to being able to talk to other workers about the benefits of being in the union. I will support every effort to make unions more powerful and to fight against corporate greed and crime.

    Thank you for this article and keep up the good work.

    Posted by Mike from Milwaukee, 01/01/2011 1:32pm (5 years ago)

  • Where can we make comments to the NLRB in support of this rule? We need to organize a campaign for this—the other side is already campaigning!

    Posted by Hank Millstein, 12/30/2010 1:20pm (5 years ago)

  • what's the name and title of the executive order? is it yet published in the federal register, along with instructions about commenting?

    all of us need to be on the phone, online between now and february. you can bet that the u.s. chamber of commerce has already mobilized their troops.

    Posted by gary hicks, 12/29/2010 8:40pm (5 years ago)

RSS feed for comments on this page | RSS feed for all comments