Obama budget seeks more funding for job retraining

wind farm3

WASHINGTON - The Obama administration's proposed federal budget for the year starting Oct. 1 calls for a major rewrite of federal job training programs for long-term unemployed adults, and $8 billion for that task, details show.

But, in a tight budget environment for domestic programs and with House Republicans' hostility towards workers, there appear to be long odds against the success of his plan.

Still, the Obama proposal is noteworthy for what it says about administration job-training priorities at a time when unemployment is still above 7 percent.

The administration's proposal also would allot another $2 billion in block grants to states to fund long-term and innovative job training and retraining programs.

The ruling House Republicans have complained the government now funds some 37 separate job training programs, including everything from Trade Adjustment Assistance (TAA), which aids workers who lose their jobs to subsidized foreign imports, to community college courses that let workers train for new jobs or upgrade their skills.

Their solution: Roll all 37 into a block grant, dump the money on governors to use as they wish - and drastically cut it. Obama wants to create an $8 billion program of "subsidized employment opportunities for (the low-income and long-term unemployed."

"Priority will be provided to employment opportunities likely to lead to unsubsi-dized employment in emerging or in-demand occupations in the local areas," his budget says.  "Funds may (also) be used to provide support services, such as transportation or child care, necessary to enable participation of individuals in employment opportunities."

The $2 billion in block grants would go for "on-the-job training, sector-based training, training supportive of an industry sector partnership, acquisition of an industry-recognized credential, connections to immediate work opportunities, career academies and/or adult basic education and integrated basic education and training models," Obama's budget blueprint adds.  If Congress kills Obama's proposal, the budget notes that by current law TAA gets cut from $1 billion this year to $656 million on Dec. 31.

In another job training proposal, the administration, for the second straight year, wants to eliminate a $1 million program that trains women for jobs in "non-traditional" fields for women, principally construction.  "The mission of expanding apprenticeship opportunities for women will continue to be advanced through the Office of Apprentice-ship's work to expand registered apprenticeships and ensure equal access to apprenticeship programs," the Obama budget blueprint says.

Photo: Obama wants to set aside $8 billion to train laid off workers for the green jobs of the future, including the building of an energy infrastructure not dependent upon fossil fuels.   Brian van der Brug/AP & Los Angeles Times

Post your comment

Comments are moderated. See guidelines here.


  • This is absolutely essential to improve opportunities particularly for chronically unemployed individuals with children. Childcare is unaffordable, unaccessible to many due to transportation and cost. If we are ever going to get folks out of poverty and earning, we MUST provide some supportive means to do so. Childcare is outpacing minimum wage for low income families. If you pay $300 a week for 2 children in daycare, which is about the lowest you will find in Phoenix, then what good is a job that pays you $290 before taxes on a minimum wage job? It is not feesible. Either minimum wage needs to be hiked to livable wages, or those making minimum wage need to be able to get subsidies for their childcare. Better yet, there should be public childcares that allow families to use it for work related childcare only. The families could pay based on a sliding scale as per their income and number of children in childcare. Noone should get it free more than a certain amount of weeks for job search. This is key to getting folks off welfare benefits and making it even possible to get employed. Folks can say, "they shouldn't have children if they can't afford them", but once they are here, that is a mute and ridiculous comment. If some are going to promote pro-life, then also promote support for the born!

    Posted by Nancy, 06/03/2013 12:12pm (2 years ago)

RSS feed for comments on this page | RSS feed for all comments