President needs to pivot back to jobs

The jobs numbers are out. Unemployment is rising across the board again, for the second month in a row, and it is now 99 percent certain that the private economy is NOT going to cause the numbers to change direction. Yet this expectation was the foundation argument behind the president's pivot toward debt negotiations with Republicans since the last election: "Now that recovery was under way, that unemployment numbers were bad but slowly improving, we can focus on debt."

So, it was argued, the president can turn to deal with the deficit and stop even talking about further stimulus and jobs programs. Unfortunately this put him in the position of debating on Republican terms which can be summarized as "no taxes for the rich, cut, cut, layoff, layoff and blame the administration for any ill effects."

In last December's temporary budget deal, Obama retained a priority on long-term investments in green technologies, infrastructure, education, and the already enacted but fragile health care reform act. And he did not give up his plan to return to the issue of ending the tax exemptions for the rich later. Nonetheless, the Republicans seized the initiative and this "confidence fairy" optimism about the pleasures of satisfying private investors resulted in extending the Bush tax cuts for the rich, while forcing substantial cutbacks in government programs.

Obama and his chief advisers were criticized strongly by the best-scoring forecasters. The stimulus, only half the size needed from the start, pulled back federally funded employment  dramatically, by nearly a million jobs. Some 577,000 state and local government workers have lost their jobs since 2008 and the rate of decline is now accelerating with the end of the stimulus funds. Private enterprise is not hiring, and not because of insufficient tax cuts - they have billions sitting in the stock market, banks and bonds. They are not hiring because no one is coming into the stores.

Quelle surprise! The pitiful rate of employment recovery softened in April and now has collapsed.  

Still, free-market ideologues are hoping for a miracle, like really cheap oil, or the rapture, or blaming it all on unions, or mismatched workers, or the "bond vigilantes." Anything to save them from seeing the obvious -- the absolute necessity of DOING SOMETHING about unemployment.

All these these madcap obsessions with imaginary white whales or other thoroughly refuted diversions must be discarded.
And it's clear what must be done. We are not like Greece, at least on the national level. We have plenty of options, and precedents, for a solution. The president must immediately give rebirth to the WPA-style direct temporary employment of the unemployed. The federal government must be the employer of last resort. If Congress cannot be persuaded to get out of gridlock, then executive action must empower some existing national and state institutions to be re-purposed to manage this critical national security task.

You cannot cure unemployment or national debt with layoffs!

Concurrent with the bad news on jobs, we approach ever closer the deadline for raising the debt ceiling. The president has made a dramatic "grand solution" He offers the unthinkable to the Republicans - almost an "offer they cannot refuse" - by "putting-on-the-table" shaving Social Security/Medicare/Medicaid in exchange for recovering fair taxes from the rich. This enables him to claim (through some complicated math that relies on a substantial rise in inflation) $4 trillion in savings over a 10-year period - double what the Republicans claim for their proposals for another million layoffs plus no taxes for the rich.
From a sophisticated political angle, the president's proposal is brilliant.

If the Republicans agree, it punts the whole debt hysteria debate past the 2012 election! Since the death of Osama bin Laden, President Obama has pretty much closed the book on attacks from the right on foreign policy. So what would be left for Republicans to run on? Not much.
On the other hand, if the Republicans do not agree, and force a debt-ceiling showdown, something no sane Republican claims to want, they will be blamed for the disaster that follows.

I applaud the president for being smarter and more grown up than his adversaries.  But if focus on the fundamentals is lost, sophistication and applause will win nothing but salt and bitterness, chaos and poverty. It is time to "pivot" back to addressing unemployment!

Post your comment

Comments are moderated. See guidelines here.


  • Good article! I'd hold the "applause for the president" however.

    The main part of this problem is twofold, at least as I see it. First of all, while the main attack against any jobs agenda is coming from the GOP/the right, it was "the president" that set up that ridiculous commission on the debt. This was around the same time that he set up the other commission to deal with "making tax system more productive, & appointed the head of GE (which paid $0.00 in taxes this past year. The Debt Commission was then stacked with extreme right, pro corporate forces (appointed by the same president).

    There was ABSOLUTELY NO NEED FOR, or OBLIGATION FOR THIS COMMISSION TO BE SET UP!! Instead of caving to the corporate right again, why was a Commission not set up for JOBS? The president could have, and most assuredly should have, gone in this direction. By appointing that absurd Debt Commission the president gave full & complete national credibility to the corporate right's drive to cut people's programs to paydown the debt. Now we are stuck in our own quicksand, and the American people are left not only without jobs, but maybe even worse, without the ability to understand that the way out of the crisis is in the fight for jobs, not to eliminate the debt.

    The other part of the problem is the one that we could actually do something about. The labor movement has been under attack and has not been able, for a number of reasons, to build and lead the needed mass people's mass movement for jobs. What is needed is a national initiative to help labor in this push. The building of this type of movement, would be able to push and influence the national administration in ways similar to the huge Unemployed Councils & the CIO did in the 30's. This needs to be the central focus of the labor/legitimate left in our national, working with allies thoughout the labor movement.

    Posted by, 07/17/2011 10:46pm (4 years ago)

  • This is an excellent article! My own gripe is that the democrats really don't offer any alternatives, since they still are very much a part of the capitalist infastructure, and won't do anything to truly change the issues at hand!

    Posted by Justin, 07/11/2011 2:30pm (4 years ago)

  • and still practically no movement toward a meaningful jobs program. We have pretty much used up the "prosperity" phase of the normal business cycle without generating jobs, and now it's likely time for the next downturn!
    --jim lane in Dallas

    Posted by jim lane, 07/11/2011 2:22pm (4 years ago)

RSS feed for comments on this page | RSS feed for all comments