Push to regulate firearms gains steam


NEW YORK - Daniel Hernandez, the intern who rushed to aid Rep. Gabriel Giffords, D-Ariz., after during the Jan. 8 Arizona shootings, traveled here today to offer his assistance to Mayors Against Illegal Guns, which has ramped up activities aimed at keeping weapons out of the hands of criminals and the mentally imbalanced.

Hernandez said the he hopes "President Obama and Congress will work together right away to reform our gun background check system so that all records of dangerous people are in the system and all gun buyers will have to pass a thorough background check."

After the assassinations of Rev. Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. and Robert F. Kennedy in 1968, Congress passed laws banning handgun ownership by criminals, drug addicts and the mentally ill. A national system of background checks was enacted in 1983 with the passage of the Brady Bill, named for the presidential press secretary who was shot when the President Regan was nearly assassinated in the early 1980s.

Still, gun violence has persisted, as was tragically shown in the Tucson shootings. Gun control advocates argue that the background check system is not up to par, and are urging Congress and President Obama to work to close loopholes.

"The time has clearly come to finally fulfill the intent of the common sense gun law passed after the 1968 assassinations of Martin Luther King, Jr. and Bobby Kennedy by creating a loophole-free background check system for the sale of firearms," New York Mayor Michael Bloomberg, who founded the mayoral anti-illegal gun coalition, yesterday," adding that, each day, 34 Americans are murdered with guns, the vast majority of which were obtained illegally.

Some of the those involved with the push by the mayoral group and its allies made clear that they are not against the ownership of guns by average Americans and have no intention of stripping that right.

"As Governor of Vermont, I received an A-rating from the [National Rifle Association], and I strongly support the right of law-abiding Americans to own a gun," said former presidential candidate and founder of Democracy for America Howard Dean. "I also believe with equal strength that felons, drug abusers, and the mentally ill have no right to guns. In fact, that's been the law in our country for 43 years since the assassinations of Martin Luther King and Robert F. Kennedy."

Hernandez agreed, saying that he wants the tightening up of background checks made in a way "that does not infringe on Second Amendment rights, so that responsible citizens may exercise their right to bear arms."

The problem, the anti-violence advocates say, is that the background check system is not working. As evidence, they point to the most recent extremely-high profile shootings: the killer students of Columbine bought guns at a gun show from an unlicensed seller; the Virginia Tech murderer was able to buy a gun because his mental health records were never reported to the FBI's check system; and the Tucson shooter also was able to buy a gun because his records weren't in the database, and because "lax federal regulations frustrated the intent of the law."

The bipartisan coalition advocates two simple fixes: they want to ensure that all mental health and other pertinent records are part of the FBI's gun database and, secondly, they argue for closing loopholes that allow the mentally ill to go around regulations by purchasing guns at gun shows and other unregulated markets.

To accomplish the first goal, the mayors say, the FBI database "should contain all the records of felony convictions, domestic violence incidents, drug history, and determinations of mental illness that would prevent those categories of troubled people from buying guns. The new Congress should set a goal of getting this job finished within three years."

The second suggestion could be fulfilled by requiring that all gun sellers check backgrounds. Right now, regular sellers must do background checks, but "occasional" sellers - people who sell only at gun shows, or through classified ads, for example - do not.

"The 34 Americans whose lives are cut short by a gun each day may not be presidents or senators, but each life is a future cut short, a life of accomplishments left undone, and a family torn apart," said Kathleen Kennedy Townsend, daughter of Robert F. Kennedy. "We owe a duty to each victim to make their life, and their sacrifice, a part of the national movement to fix our gun background check system so it is thorough, complete and comprehensive."

Martin Luther King III added, "We must enforce our public safety laws to keep the angry and dangerous few from destroying the peace and harmony of the many."

The group released an open letter to Obama and the Congress, and has also asked that people sign on to their petition.

Photo: "Occasional" sellers, like those at the Houston gun show, are not required to perform background checks. Photo by M Glasgow // CC BY 2.0

Post your comment

Comments are moderated. See guidelines here.


  • Both Buzz and Bruce make excellent points. There are laws are in place to "ensure safety of the populace" however; laws DO NOT ensure safety or prevent crime. It is STUPID to think that a law deters or prevents ANY crime. A law is enacted to provide a civilly sanctioned course of revenge against an offender.

    What DOES prevent violence and crime is addressing the issues that foster it - mental health, poverty, education. These are not easy or expedient and therefor are overlooked.

    Mental health is tricky - Simply lumping all persons seeking therapy or counseling into a "You Can't Own Guns" bucket is dumb. Patients with certain diagnoses SHOULD be barred from owning firearms. Some forever, others pending a period of clean mental health as determined by a qualified provider.

    There is also the tricky issue of latent mental health issues; for example - schizophrenia or dementia may not be present when someone first seeks ownership of a firearm, yet may arise years later during a time of duress. You now have a formerly legal, responsible gun owner who has become a nut with access to a firearm.

    Drug Addicts is too loose - Is a stoner REALLY likely to go and shoot up ANYTHING? A junkie or crack head might though, and what about Medical Marijuana users? While federally they are still breaking the law, the states in which they reside sanction and approve of their use.

    Too much political bias and idealism on either side for this issue to get resolved effectively.

    Posted by Forrest, 02/24/2011 4:54pm (5 years ago)

  • ""The 34 Americans whose lives are cut short by a gun each day may not be presidents or senators, but each life is a future cut short, a life of accomplishments left undone, and a family torn apart,""

    34 Americans are not killed every day by a gun. Those who are killed by guns are human beings. It's insulting and inaccurate to reduce them to a statistic.

    Posted by Hank, 01/30/2011 8:29pm (5 years ago)

  • My only concern here is that it may add to an environment which already stigmatizes those who may wish to seek mental health on their own. Granted, in many cases these individuals may not even be aware that they are in need of help. But would this stipulation to the law involve any and all individuals who would seek mental health counseling? Would it include those who are simply a little depressed? Where is the line and who decides where the line is? A total disclosure of all mental health records opens the door to serious implications regarding Doctor/Patient privilege and HIPPA regulations as well. There is much to be taken into account here, not the least of which is the possibility that those who may wish to seek help but don't because they are afraid that it may adversely affect their constitutional rights. This would create an atmosphere in which those that need help simply won't seek it. And again we have disturbed individuals running around with guns. But just think of the savings we would reap for insurance companies--they would not be forced to pay for mental health benefits that they might without this stigmatization.

    Posted by Bruce, 01/30/2011 1:48pm (5 years ago)

  • Well, if the Obama regime wants to de-legitimize itself with the American people I cannot think of a better way than to push for gun control.

    Posted by John B. Thayer, 01/27/2011 11:35pm (5 years ago)

  • You people make my ass twitch. There are no "loop-holes". Any licensed dealer MUST run a potential buyer through the NICS system.

    Any citizen can sell their property (guns) to anyone they choose. If you try to make that illegal, the mentally defective and the criminals will either buy their guns from other mental defects or criminals, OR they'll use another weapon.

    How many people could that guy in Tucson have killed with a '57 Chevy?? How would the bystanders have tackled him then?

    Life's tough, wear a cup.

    Posted by Buz, 01/27/2011 3:55pm (5 years ago)

RSS feed for comments on this page | RSS feed for all comments