South Dakota commits shocking genocide against Native Americans

pineridgechild360x300

Genocide is not too strong a term for what is now happening in South Dakota. The huge, shocking violation of legal and human rights being carried out by the state is tantamount to genocide against the Native American nations, the Lakota, Dakota and Nakota Sioux, residing within its borders. It is the abduction and kidnapping by state officials, under the cover of law, of American Indian children.

This is a gross violation of the Indian Child Welfare Act (ICWA) of 1978. Further, these abominable kidnappings are being upheld by the courts of that state.

The best approach to this crime against humanity is by the following initial checklist:

1. Over 700 American Indian children are removed by South Dakota state officials from their homes every year.

2. These hundreds are sent to white foster homes or group homes.

3. Many are adopted by white families.

4. Indian children account for 13.8 percent of the state's child population, yet they represent 56.3 percent of the foster care population.

5. Of the hundreds of Native children in foster care in 2011, 87 percent were placed in non-Indian homes while Native foster homes went empty.

6. Because of its targeting Native children, South Dakota is currently removing children from their families at a higher rate than the vast majority of other states in the U.S.

7. Once removed, the state's courts routinely keep Indian children from even seeing their families for at least 60 days.

8. The state's Department of Social Services (DSS) workers warn Native children that if they become emotional during a visit with their parents, the visits will be discontinued (this is incredible!).                   

This is genocide as defined by the United Nations General Assembly's Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide. This Convention (Article 2) defines genocide as follows :

"... any of the following acts commit with intent  to destroy, in whole or in part, a national, ethnical, racial or religious group, as such:

(a) Killing members of the group;

(b) Causing serious bodily or mental harm to members of the group;

(c) Deliberately inflicting on the group conditions of life calculated to bring about its destruction in whole or in part;

(d) Imposing measures intended to prevent births within the group;

(e) Forcibly transferring children of the group to another group."

South Dakota is committing blatant and flagrant genocide against the Sioux people in violation of subsection (e) of Article 2 by transferring Indian children to white homes, and also of subsection (b) amid allegations of sexual abuse and drugging of Native children in DSS foster care. Those responsible need to be brought to justice in an international court of law in addition to the lawsuit already filed in U.S courts (see below). This is a most serious case of ethnic cleansing.

One Indian mother had 62 hearings and was never allowed to present any witness testimony, never even allowed to see the petition filed against her.  This is a huge violation of long established U.S. due process. Also, the Indian Child Welfare Act mandates that Native children shall first be placed with tribal relatives, non-related tribal members, or members of other tribes before non-Indian families can be considered.

South Dakota has taken a step back into the late 19th century, when thousands of Indian children were forcibly removed from their homes by U.S. soldiers and sent to boarding schools - allegedly for education, where the motto was "Kill the Indian, Save the Man." In some of these schools the motto was more akin to simply "Kill the Indian."

This journalist has heard numerous accounts from families across Indian Country who had lost at least one child to the boarding school system in the 19th century. They were told that their child or children had run away from the school and could not be found. In other cases they were informed that their child had died from illness.

For the Lakota people this has been a continuation of a 100-year history of child abduction. This began in the 1880s under the U.S. government policy of forced assimilation (genocide); children as young as 5 years old were forcibly removed from their homes and taken to boarding schools hundreds of miles away. Now it is happening again, this time under the mask of state-run foster care. Over the past decade over 5,000 Sioux children have been removed from their homes. According to a recent report by the Indian Child Welfare Act directors in South Dakota, 740 Lakota children are removed to foster care each year and 90 percent are placed in white homes and institutions.

A vigorous campaign is currently being waged by the Lakota People's Law Project to secure the return of over 2,200 Lakota, Dakota and Nakota children illegally taken from their homes by DSS.

Among the results of the LPLP efforts was the recent Great Plains Indian Child Welfare Act Summit held May 15-17 in Rapid City, South Dakota. The summit was held in an atmosphere that has been characterized by the Oglala Sioux Tribe as a "child welfare emergency."

The summit also had as a backdrop a federal class action lawsuit that was filed on March 21 by the Oglala and Rosebud Sioux Tribes and tribal members, challenging the continued removal of Native children in Pennington County, South Dakota, from their homes.

South Dakota DSS has asserted that it had authority to remove children by tribal court order or tribal council agreement. The states have no authority over such youngsters; the tribes have exclusive jurisdiction over Indian children residing on reservations.

However, investigations by LPLP found that South Dakota's assertions are blatantly false.

Typically, DSS would receive a false report of child neglect on a given reservation and without any legal authority would snatch the child in question without any notification to the child's relatives. In one such instance DSS abducted a young boy when he left his relatives to use the restroom while family members were attending a high school graduation ceremony. It was weeks before his family found where he had been taken.

Aside from the genocidal racism involved there is a financial motive on the part of the state. South Dakota receives $79,000 from the federal government per year per child for every Native youngster it removes, but provides only $9,000 to a white foster home. The remaining $70,000 is deposited in state coffers.

The president of the Oglala Sioux Tribe and other Natives feel that the ICWA lawsuit is for greater fairness for all families, regardless of race, including whites. But, it must be remembered that white youngsters are not being sent to non-white homes; for whites, genocide is obviously not an issue. The humanity of Indian people, particularly in the face of the racism they have endured is truly poignant and moving. This becomes a movement not just for Indian people, but for all, led by long-suffering, grieving Native families.

Update: The Lakota People's Law Project website has petitions that people can sign and also a place to sign up to receive updates on developments as they happen.

Photo: Pine Ridge Indian Reservation child. Pamela Cook, Flickr, CC BY NC SA 2.0

 

Post your comment

Comments are moderated. See guidelines here.

Comments

  • Unfortunately this kidnapping by state officials is being conducted across the nation. Our children were kidnapped by the State of Michigan in 2008- the kidnapping was substantiated by FBI agents. We are still fighting to clear our names be given justice and free our family. The denial of due process is common practice. Proper investigations, court hearings, evidentiary procedures, trials, etc. are all denied to the families. In fact more common is the planting and falsification of evidence, perjury, denial of court hearings, denial of visitations, etc. If the citizens of this nation were afforded their Constitutional rights then the states would not be making an amount of money so great that it cannot be given a number. Over the course of our ordeal we have found that the government of the United States and each state do not believe in justice or the Constitution. They will go into other countries and impose sanctions against the government for abusing their citizens when they themselves commit atrocities against their own citizens- hypocrisy! It come down to the bottom line, as you mentioned the states receive a lot of federal money for removing children. We have also found that corruption has removed the checks and balances that were put in place by the founding fathers. When charges can only be brought by an officer of the law and the attorney generals- both state and federal- refuse to authorize warrants, then justice is never brought for the true victims- the citizens of this nation. There was a case fought and won in the State of Michigan by Patrick and Sandra O'Donnell (Case Number 5:02-CV-143, July 30, 2004) in which the Honorable Gordon J. Quist of the United States District Court for the Western District of Michigan, Southern Division ruled that the government officials could be held accountable in their individual capacities if their actions were outside the scope of the law. He also ruled that state "laws" 'cannot be construed to displace- the protections of the United States Constitution- even when the state acts to protect the welfare of children'. The laws are there. We are calling on the officers of the law, lawyers and judges to take a stand. Stop making deals and apply the law. Let's hold the representatives of the agencies accountable. We need balance and protection. If we do not protect our family unit today we will not have one tomorrow.

    Posted by Pam, 06/05/2013 8:08am (1 year ago)

  • Who do we write about this horrific practice? What can be done?

    Posted by Kristene Hiepler-Hartwig, 06/05/2013 8:01am (1 year ago)

  • A staggering look at a disgusting practice. May justice be swift and frighteningly expensive for those responsible.

    Posted by Vicki Hughes, 06/05/2013 7:33am (1 year ago)

  • why are the kids being taken from the homes in the first place??? drugs booze violence proverty??? white foster homes?? ....is this because there is a lack of native foster homes???
    hey i am native american too, and i live a traditional life, my kids and i go to sweats etc etc, no booze drugs violence proverty etc in my home so i aint worried about child protection agencies coming in and taking my kids.
    I think in this day and how shit is going.....screaming genocide just doesnt fly anymore.
    band together and get shit cleaned up on reserves instead of continuing these f'd up cycles!!

    Posted by CRIS, 06/05/2013 3:59am (1 year ago)

  • I am horrified that in this day and age innocent children are being taken away from their families and while there are no doubt cases that may warrant the removal of a child , for his or her protection, this must be done under the exact same conditions as any other white child, anywhere around the world, so that ONLY if the child is in any physical or emotionally abusive situation should he or she ever be removed from his or her family. This is the 21st Century and governments should act in an enlightened, humane manner and NEVER abuse the trust that the people have given them, they have been voted into their positions of power, let them NOT abuse this power given to them by the people!!!!! Never forget that ALL MEN ARE CREATED EQUAL which must also apply to ALL CHILDREN !! The children's' rights should always be of paramount importance in these matters. Don"t let South Dakota be known for all the wrong reasons!!!

    Posted by Astrid Ansems, 06/05/2013 1:54am (1 year ago)

  • Thank you for this article and the new awarenesses I am taking with me from it. I pledge here to spread this news via social media with the intention of supporting your cause.

    Sincerely,

    Brian Edgar

    Posted by Brian Edgar, 06/05/2013 1:16am (1 year ago)

  • I am sickened by this. Is there any action being taken against this tragedy? I'm horrified!

    Posted by Marianne Hart, 06/05/2013 1:03am (1 year ago)

  • this is wrong
    it should not be sabctioned
    i ask again
    DO YOU BELIEVE THE GOVERNMENT HAS YOUR 6???

    Posted by jeannemarie coulter, 06/05/2013 12:42am (1 year ago)

  • THE STATE OF SOUTH DAKOTA MUST BE PROSECUTED FOR THESE CRIMINAL ACTS AND HELD ACCOUNTABLE FOR THE WHOLE WORLD TO SEE!

    The $ the state has received and is receiving for their crimes should be given to the Native Families!

    Public apologies must be give and names of these criminals made public for all to see who they are!

    Posted by INEZ TOMASKOVICH, 06/05/2013 12:11am (1 year ago)

  • this has to stop now !!!!!! how can to take our kids our blood our life from us????you have NO right you can not steal our kids.

    Posted by kathleen field, 06/04/2013 10:57pm (1 year ago)

RSS feed for comments on this page | RSS feed for all comments