Trump yanks dollars from Minnesota unless it kills Project Labor Agreements
Members of the Building Trades brought signs to the St. Louis County Board meeting, urging commissioners to keep PLA language in contracts.| Duluth Labor World

HIBBING, Minn.—In what could be a portent for other counties and cities seeking federal funds for infrastructure projects, the GOP Trump government’s Transportation Department threatens to yank $7.7 million for five St. Louis County, Minn., road and bridge projects, unless the county drops its requirements that contractors sign Project Labor Agreements.

And, given the strong union tradition in Minnesota’s Northland, the county board is—so far—refusing. 

But it also faces the fact that $7.7 million is a lot of money for a rural county, and that it may seek more federal funds for other projects down the line, and face the same dilemma. The board scheduled a vote on the issue for April 7.

Nevertheless, the Trump government’s demand “is union-busting 101,” said county board Chair Mike Jugovich, a Steelworker. “I don’t bust unions. I build them.”

Members of the area’s Building and Construction Trades unions jammed the March 24 meeting of the county board in Hibbing to speak up strongly for the PLAs, which guarantee projects finish with set budgets, high quality, good pay for local union workers—not imported cheaper labor—and labor-management disputes jointly worked out through cooperation on the job.

The Building Trades members brought signs to the board meeting, urging commissioners to keep PLA language in contracts. The St. Louis County projects have turned into a faceoff between the feds and the county—and the county commissioners signaled that a fight is brewing.

The requirement about dropping PLAs appears to have come from a series of emails from former TV reality star Sean Duffy, now Trump’s Transportation Secretary, and his office, as well as the U.S. attorney’s office.

All St. Louis County projects require a PLA unless it’s prohibited by law. According to Jim Foldesi, director of public works for St. Louis County, the usual process required the county to get permission for PLAs on federal projects by writing a justification letter to the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) that has, in the past, been routinely approved. 

“This time around…we haven’t gotten any clarifying responses, we just haven’t got an answer,” Foldesi told the board. The county has received an email from the federal government saying that if the county decides to move forward with PLAs without FHWA approval, the projects will not be eligible for federal funds.

St. Louis County was an early adopter in these kinds of agreements, requiring prevailing wage language for projects since 1973 and approving PLA requirements in 2004. At the time, an executive order from then-President George W. Bush, a Republican, prohibited PLAs on federal projects, and St. Louis County followed the order. 

Democratic President Barack Obama rescinded the prohibition, and in 2014, St. Louis County implemented its requirement at that time.

But now, “legally, we’re in no man’s land,” Foldesi told the board. “Our purchasing rules require us to cut PLAs on these projects unless the board exempts them from the policy. That’s why we have to come to the board at this time, to ask for these five projects to be exempted from the policy.”

At stake is $7.7 million in federal funds for $14 million in projects. The projects include work on 40th Ave. West in Duluth, Highway 21 in Pike Lake, and Embarrass Township and Canosia Road outside of Duluth, among others.

Foldesi warned that refusing these funds by not dropping PLAs could jeopardize the county’s strong reputation as a “dependable partner” for the federal government. “We have never turned back funds or failed to deliver, and we will not be able to check that box anymore. It hurts our ability to go after federal funds,” he said.

In addition, it could jeopardize requests at the state level, Foldesi said. “It’s hard to ask for money when we’re turning back money.”

Foldesi said because of the strength of local contractors and their ability to control materials, he expected bids to still go to them even without PLA requirements. “Contractors and trades can also still sign PLAs; we just can’t require it.”

As a result, the public works administration is requesting the county to exempt the five projects receiving federal funds. Members of the Building Trades attended a meeting to tell commissioners to hold strong.

Dropping the PLA requirement “opens us up for a race to the bottom,” said Jack Carlson, president of the Duluth Construction and Building Trades Council. “We don’t know what will happen 5, 10, 15 years down the road with this administration, let alone tomorrow.”

“PLAs have been used for years because they work,” said Kyle Bukovich, president of the Northern Wisconsin Building Trades Council. “We’re talking here about making a permanent decision under short-term pressure. Two years from now, we won’t be talking about how smart this decision was. We’ll be talking about how to fix what was undone.”

Jeremy Lambert, an organizer with Iron Workers Local 512, said that as a Wisconsin resident who works across the northland, he knows what not having the protections of a PLA is like. “[St. Louis County] is one of the strongest labor areas in the whole United States, and you have to think about local people as you make these decisions,” he said.

Commissioners acknowledged the conundrum and delayed a vote until April 7, hoping to find a solution in the meantime. In addition, they questioned why their congressman, GOP Rep. Pete Stauber, has done so little to help.

Stauber provided a comment to the Duluth Monitor about the issue in March: “Project Labor Agreements are our way of life in Northern Minnesota and an established standard for projects in the region. It would be foolish for St. Louis County Commissioners to walk away from millions of federal highway dollars that will improve the lives of our shared constituencies.”

“Why isn’t he doing anything in his power to do something about this?” said Annie Harala, 1st District commissioner. “He can’t take time to stand with workers here? I encourage everyone to reach out to Stauber to get something done…Our families are not a bargaining chip.”

Keith Musolf, 5th District commissioner and member of Iron Workers Local 512, said the federal government is union-busting. “This is a labor strong-wall in the U.S., and that’s exactly why it’s being tested. If we waver now, we have nothing to stand on,” Musolf said. “I don’t believe we should be doing this to the men and women working in St. Louis County. Why are they on the menu? That’s a bunch of crap.”

Patrick Boyle, 2nd District commissioner, brought up the federally mandated changes to DEI (diversity, equity, and inclusion) policies that arose last year, and Jim Gottschald, director of human resources for St. Louis County, said it was a similar issue. He said the federal government used federal dollars as pressure on administrations to make the changes, but those changes came with a cost nonetheless.

“Not only employees but our community partners came to our board meetings and were critical of the actions to step back,” Gottschald said. “The justification was we were not in a position to jeopardize funds, and there was an additional liability for those who signed agreements under the False Claims Act. It was deemed to be too high of a risk for the county to continue its practice in this space. We made some pretty significant changes, and we still live with the fallout of those.”

Ashley Grimm, 3rd District commissioner, said solidarity was needed more than ever. “There’s no good solution because when the federal government plays hardball, and you resist, it hurts. But we also have to hold some kind of line.”

Board Chair Jugovich, who is also the 7th District commissioner, invoked his background as a Steelworker. “I completely agree with Commissioner Musolf, this is union busting 101, and I don’t bust unions. I build them. I’m a Steelworker, and I’ll be one until I die–and maybe I’ll haunt some of you,” he said to laughter. 

“If this wasn’t union busting, there never would have been language around PLAs. If we don’t stand up to this, it’s the top of the spear, and the tip will drive in, and it will break. I cannot look people in the eye and say I support unions and PLAs until 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue says I can’t. We don’t want to lose that money, but I don’t want to lose my soul along the way.” 

Catherine Conlan is the editor of Duluth Labor World

We hope you appreciated this article. At People’s World, we believe news and information should be free and accessible to all, but we need your help. Our journalism is free of corporate influence and paywalls because we are totally reader-supported. Only you, our readers and supporters, make this possible. If you enjoy reading People’s World and the stories we bring you, please support our work by donating or becoming a monthly sustainer today. Thank you!


CONTRIBUTOR

Catherine Conlan
Catherine Conlan

Catherine Conlan is Manager and Editor at The Labor World newspaper, Minnesota’s oldest continuous labor newspaper, founded in 1896. It is published by and for the member unions of the Duluth Central Labor Body and also covers a variety of broader social justice issues.