Trump snubbed McCain, but the media snubbed the rest of us
en. John McCain and President Donald Trump. | Photos: Patrick Semansky and John Locher / AP | Photo illustration: People's World

Editors’ NoteSen. John McCain of Arizona died on August 25, 2018. McCain’s career, as both a U.S. Senator and before, was full of contradictions. He has long been one of the most outspoken advocates of the use of U.S. military force in the world; opposed the Equal Rights Amendment and the Martin Luther King, Jr. holiday; was against busing; supported right-wing supply-side economics; and, more recently, voted in favor of every Trump federal nominee that came before the Senate. However, he also represents a dividing line in the current battle for factional control inside the Republican Party. McCain separated himself from Trump on issues such as immigration reform, the Affordable Care Act, climate change, and LGBTQ equality. In the past, he supported sanctions against apartheid South Africa and advocated for normalization of relations with Vietnam. In this column, written just days before McCain’s death, Peter Certo, the editorial manager of the Institute for Policy Studies, deals with the Trump-McCain feud by examining the just-approved $717 billion McCain Defense Bill, signed into law by the president.

On an otherwise sleepy August day, President Trump signed the John McCain National Defense Authorization Act. Named for the dying Arizona senator who’s championed military budgets for his entire career, the bill increases U.S. military spending to an astonishing $717 billion.

According to my Institute for Policy Studies colleague Lindsay Koshgarian, that’s about double what American taxpayers were spending at the end of the Cold War, and upwards of $300 billion more than what we spent before the War on Terror.

The bill also contains language encouraging a confrontation with Iran, while also making it possible for the administration to continue offering weapons and support to the Saudi-led coalition that’s bombing Yemen. (Where the very week the bill was signed, they bombed a school bus, killing 51 people—40 of them children.)

You’d expect a bill of this magnitude to generate lots of critical coverage—and you’d be right! But only kind of.

The most controversial thing about this bill, to hear most of the media tell it, is that the president refused to thank John McCain when he signed it.

Countless outlets, from Newsweek to TIME to the Washington Post, reported the omission as a “snub” against the bill’s namesake senator, an occasional Trump critic. CNN’s Jake Tapper used an entire segment on his show to scold the president about it—and even sanctimoniously thanked McCain himself.

The New York Times ran the numbers: Trump spoke for 28 minutes about the bill, with 0 mentions of McCain.

I ran some numbers of my own: A Google news search on the story turned up nearly 150,000 pieces like this. That’s almost 3 times the number of results I got when I searched the same story but replaced “John McCain” with the actual price tag of the bill: $717 billion.

To put it kindly, this is garbage.

If the media deems a petty snub more controversial than a massive, warmongering spending bill, you can be sure Congress will follow. The bill passed by huge bipartisan margins in both the House and Senate.

I can assure you, Trump’s not going to speak more kindly of John McCain as a result of this coverage. But more school buses are probably going to get blown up — and so are more pressing human needs in our own communities.

For instance, my home state of Ohio has, by some measures, the most student debt of any state. According to Koshgarian, taxpayers there spent $15.5 billion on the Pentagon base budget alone this past year. For that money, we could’ve funded nearly 700,000 four-year Pell grants.

For Texas, the most uninsured state in the union, their $45 billion in Pentagon dollars could’ve covered 15 million adults and 16 million kids. That’s the entire state—and then some.

Flint, Michigan taxpayers, Koshgarian calculates, spent some $38 million. That could’ve paid for nearly 700 infrastructure jobs to fix things like, say, lead in their water pipes.

Nationally, that money could’ve provided solar power to the entire country. Or funded universal health care. Or debt-free higher education. Instead, we’ll be shelling out more money on fruitless, destructive wars and boondoggle weapons systems like the F-35 (which McCain himself has called “a scandal and a tragedy”).

The real scandal is that such expenditures aren’t deemed controversial—not by our lawmakers, and not by many of the outlets that cover them. Next time they say McCain’s name, they should report what his bill costs the rest of us.



Peter Certo
Peter Certo

Peter Certo is the Communications Director at the Institute for Policy Studies and editor of OtherWords.