Nuclear submarine pact uses Australian people as pawns in new Cold War

A U.S. Los Angeles-class fast attack submarine sails into Guam after a patrol in the Pacific Ocean. A pact with Australia and the U.K. will see nuclear submarine technology shared with Australia in an attempt to target China. | Naomi Johnson / U.S. Navy via AP

People’s World recently reported on the nuclear submarine deal concluded between Australia, the United States, and Britain and the danger it represents to peace in the Asia-Pacific region. Below, we present a guest op-ed from analyst Anna Pha, who writes regularly for The Guardian, a weekly socialist newspaper in Australia.

U.S. President Joe Biden, British Prime Minister Boris Johnson, and Australia’s PM Scott Morrison lined up like three stooges in a stage-managed virtual presentation to announce the formation of yet another military alliance—AUKUS. Morrison sold the deal as a win for Australia. He had a big smile on his face, but Biden’s smile was bigger, knowing that he had secured such a lucrative deal for the U.S. military-industrial complex.

Morrison unceremoniously ditched the $90+ billion contract for twelve Attack-class conventional submarines from French military contractor Naval Group. In its place, Australia will purchase eight nuclear-powered submarines from either the U.K. or the U.S.—all things considered, it will be the U.S.

The damage to Australia is far more serious than reputational. Apart from turning Australia into a military target, the economic fallout will be huge for the people of Australia.

Blank check

Morrison signed a blank check for the submarines. The cost, details of the submarines, the builder, and the time of delivery are unspecified. All that we have been told is that it will cost the Australian people more than the French ones would have. The original contract for them was for $40 billion, which over time blew out to $90 billion. The French ones were to be delivered by 2030. The nuclear-powered submarines will cost billions of dollars (more than $100 billion) and will be ready around 2040 at the earliest.

“The Government’s intention is to build the nuclear-powered submarines in South Australia, maximizing the use of Australian workers,” Morrison said.

Jobs? Built in Australia? Already those promises are evaporating.

It only took a few days following the announcement for the proportion of components being built in Australia to shrink to a minority. As for jobs, the sector is capital intensive. The same amount spent on nurses, teachers, construction workers, and community services would create hundreds of thousands more jobs.

The bill will keep growing with billions more in cost overruns.

The Morrison government has agreed to the U.S. having a base in Darwin, which will be paid for by Australian taxpayers. Who knows how much will be spent on upgrading the Collins class submarines that were to be taken out of service by 2030? There are suggestions that Australia should hire some nuclear-powered submarines in the meantime—another cost.

“Enormous cost”

Defense Minister Peter Dutton refuses to give any figure for the additional costs of its latest shopping list. “It’s not going to be a cheap project, but maintaining peace is not something that comes for free,” he said. An understatement if ever there was one! It will be an “enormous cost” according to Dutton.

“If we have to pay an economic price for that, that’s something that we’re prepared to pay,” Trade Minister Dan Tehan said. “In the end, our values are so important to us, and we think that they’re something that we have to protect above all else.”

Australia will purchase eight nuclear-powered submarines, extend the life of its existing Collins class submarines, fund a U.S. base on Australian soil, possibly rent some nuclear-powered submarines, and acquire additional long-range strike capabilities for the Australian Defence Force. This additional long-range strike capability aims at “enhancing the ADF’s ability to deliver strike effects across our air, land, and maritime domains,” Morrison said.

It includes Tomahawk Cruise Missiles, Joint Air-to-Surface Standoff Missiles (Extended Range), Long-Range Anti-Ship Missiles (Extended Range), precision strike guided missiles, and the development of hypersonic missiles in collaboration with the US.

The military budget will increase from around 2% of gross domestic product to between 3 and 4%.

Economic hit

When other economies went into recession as a result of the global financial crisis, Australia avoided recession because of China’s growing economy and its purchase of Australian commodities and investments.

The Australian economy owes its first trade surplus in almost fifty years to China. China takes around 80% of our iron ore exports—iron ore being our largest. The price of iron ore recently sky-rocketed to over $200 a ton, although it has since fallen.

The Australian government has restricted Chinese investments in Australia, demonized the Communist Party of China and the Chinese government, attempted to intervene in the internal affairs of China, and challenged Chinese exports at the World Trade Organization.

Tourism and education were two of Australia’s major exports until COVID hit. China was one of the biggest markets. Tehan has been at the forefront of removing Chinese “influence” from universities.

The government should not be surprised if the Chinese look elsewhere. Other Australian exporters are already feeling the pinch from China’s quotas and increased tariffs on exports of coal, barley, timber, lobster, and wine.

China is already reducing its imports of iron ore as it tackles climate change and attempts to take the heat out of the market. If China imposes restrictions on imports from Australia or cuts back on imports of iron ore, the Australian government has only asked for such a response.

The Morrison government seems intent on pushing China to the point of no return with its brinkmanship. In doing so, it is playing with the lives and well-being of not only Australians but the people of the whole region.

Height of arrogance

One of China’s strategic and economic successes is its diplomacy, conduct of economic relations on an equal and mutually beneficial basis, and integration with other economies, large and small, around the world. China has applied to join the Comprehensive and Progressive Agreement for Trans-Pacific Partnership (CPTPP), which has eleven members all bordering or in the Pacific, including Australia. To be accepted, unanimous agreement by CPTPP members is needed. The U.S. pulled out under former President Donald Trump.

The Morrison government has arrogantly said it would not agree unless the Chinese government resumed ministerial discussions between the two countries and removed “sanctions” it had applied to Australian exports. In addition to holding China hostage to its demands, Morrison at the same time urged Biden to break an election promise and return to the CPTPP.

The Chinese newspaper Global Times issued a blunt warning to Australia: “There is no path to future prosperity for an Australia which chooses to isolate itself from the region’s largest economy.”

There could be other economic repercussions. France’s anger is palpable, and the European Union is stunned by the behavior of the U.S. and Australia. It is not clear yet whether Australia’s negotiations with the E.U. for a free trade agreement are compromised.

Economic crisis looming

Australia was already sliding into recession when the COVID pandemic hit. The $90 billion spent on JobKeeper (unemployment benefits), the billions on the JobSeeker supplement, and handouts to business provided the necessary stimulus to stave off a serious recession.

The federal government’s gross debt is over $800 billion and was projected to peak at $1 trillion. Debt itself is not bad; it depends on what it is used for and the ability to repay it. It was not so long ago that fear was being instilled in young people that they would be left to repay a huge debt. If the government had spent on job creation and not cut corporate taxes and income taxes for the rich, debt would not be an issue. Full employment would bring in additional revenue through personal income tax and over time pay off the debt.

The Parliamentary Budget Office, in its latest medium-term outlook prior to the latest big-spend announcement, estimated that spending on defense would rise by almost 70% in the coming ten years to more than $75 billion per annum. At present, it is $44 billion. This additional debt will be run up on killing machines and create few if any, jobs. That estimate is set to rise by billions with the forthcoming escalation of military purchases.

The neoliberal Coalition government led by Morrison will be determined to commence reducing that debt and budget deficits as quickly as possible. It will slash spending on social security recipients, pensioners, and the most vulnerable. Services will be cut. Public servants sacked. Health and education will take a hit. The likelihood of war will become greater, bringing death and destruction.

And for what?

For U.S. imperialism’s war preparations. This madness must be stopped.

The Guardian (Australia)

---

CONTRIBUTOR

Anna Pha

Anna Pha is a journalist for The Guardian, the worker’s weekly published by the Communist Party of Australia. She has a widely acclaimed reputation for her research and presentation of many feature articles on a range of topics, particularly in the field of economics. She was a teacher and held a position on the Executive of the Victorian Trades Hall Council.